+463.3%
GLW vs DINO
+106.4%
+356.9%
-51.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DINO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.6% | +2.8% | +4.8% | +7.3% |
| 7D | +14.0% | +4.2% | +9.8% | +13.6% |
| 30D | +0.4% | +33.9% | -33.5% | -2.2% |
| 3M | -11.3% | +50.5% | -61.9% | -14.8% |
| 6M | +35.1% | +95.2% | -60.1% | +25.1% |
| YTD | +90.5% | +140.6% | -50.0% | +69.4% |
| 1Y | +132.0% | +119.0% | +13.1% | +109.6% |
| 3Y | +463.3% | +100.4% | +362.9% | +361.3% |
| All | +463.3% | +106.4% | +356.9% | +361.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DINO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DINO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DINO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DINO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling