+338.2%
GLW vs DINO
+115.3%
+223.0%
-59.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DINO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.5% | 0.0% | -4.6% | -4.5% |
| 7D | +7.5% | +5.7% | +1.8% | +6.8% |
| 30D | -19.0% | -19.6% | +0.5% | -17.5% |
| 3M | -27.9% | +11.8% | -39.7% | -28.5% |
| 6M | -44.6% | +49.0% | -93.5% | -46.6% |
| YTD | +31.0% | +128.1% | -97.1% | +17.5% |
| 1Y | +39.7% | +96.3% | -56.6% | +28.8% |
| 3Y | +338.2% | +113.8% | +224.4% | +258.0% |
| All | +338.2% | +115.3% | +223.0% | +258.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DINO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DINO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DINO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DINO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling