+356.1%
GLW vs CMS
+37.9%
+318.2%
-59.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CMS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.3% | +0.5% | +8.7% | +9.2% |
| 7D | -5.9% | -0.9% | -5.0% | -5.9% |
| 30D | -26.0% | +7.1% | -33.1% | -26.4% |
| 3M | -29.9% | -1.3% | -28.6% | -29.9% |
| 6M | -37.8% | -2.7% | -35.1% | -38.0% |
| YTD | +33.1% | +2.6% | +30.5% | +32.7% |
| 1Y | +36.8% | -2.0% | +38.8% | +36.8% |
| 3Y | +356.1% | +39.6% | +316.5% | +319.4% |
| All | +356.1% | +37.9% | +318.2% | +319.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CMS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CMS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CMS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CMS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling