+478.1%
GLW vs CLSK
+202.5%
+275.6%
-51.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CLSK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.5% | -1.5% | +3.0% | +1.7% |
| 7D | +16.9% | +17.2% | -0.3% | +14.5% |
| 30D | +7.0% | +14.6% | -7.6% | +5.0% |
| 3M | -3.0% | -16.8% | +13.9% | -1.5% |
| 6M | +31.0% | +38.2% | -7.2% | +26.0% |
| YTD | +93.4% | +31.2% | +62.2% | +85.8% |
| 1Y | +134.7% | +37.3% | +97.4% | +123.3% |
| All | +478.1% | +202.5% | +275.6% | +386.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CLSK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CLSK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CLSK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CLSK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling