+6.9%
GLW vs ABCL
+208.9%
-202.0%
-51.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.7% | -1.2% | +6.9% | +6.0% |
| 7D | +3.8% | +0.7% | +3.1% | +3.6% |
| 30D | -1.3% | +93.1% | -94.4% | -21.8% |
| 3M | -21.8% | +79.4% | -101.2% | -36.6% |
| 6M | +6.9% | +214.9% | -208.0% | -38.1% |
| All | +6.9% | +208.9% | -202.0% | -38.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling