-28.6%
GLIBA vs VOO
+18.9%
-47.4%
-49.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -0.5% | -0.8% | -1.1% |
| 7D | -3.2% | -0.4% | -2.9% | -3.1% |
| 30D | +1.8% | -1.4% | +3.1% | +2.1% |
| 3M | +24.4% | +3.7% | +20.7% | +23.8% |
| 6M | -31.1% | +13.0% | -44.1% | -34.3% |
| YTD | -29.8% | +12.4% | -42.3% | -33.1% |
| 1Y | -28.6% | +18.6% | -47.2% | -37.1% |
| All | -28.6% | +18.9% | -47.4% | -37.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling