-87.0%
GLGG vs VOO
+21.8%
-108.8%
-95.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -1.2% | +1.2% | -2.7% |
| 7D | -28.1% | -1.0% | -27.1% | -30.3% |
| 30D | -68.6% | -1.2% | -67.4% | -70.0% |
| 3M | -69.1% | +2.5% | -71.6% | -69.6% |
| 6M | -91.0% | +15.2% | -106.2% | -69.8% |
| YTD | -91.0% | +15.2% | -106.2% | -69.8% |
| 1Y | -93.8% | +15.7% | -109.5% | -78.9% |
| All | -87.0% | +21.8% | -108.8% | -63.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling