-59.5%
GLGG vs VOO
+22.5%
-82.0%
-92.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -0.4% | -0.6% | +1.9% |
| 7D | +26.8% | +0.1% | +26.6% | +27.2% |
| 30D | +78.3% | +0.1% | +78.3% | +80.2% |
| 3M | -37.2% | +2.0% | -39.2% | -40.2% |
| 6M | -29.7% | +13.0% | -42.7% | -66.1% |
| YTD | -36.2% | +13.6% | -49.8% | -66.0% |
| 1Y | -54.8% | +20.1% | -74.9% | -78.8% |
| All | -59.5% | +22.5% | -82.0% | -82.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling