+104.1%
GLDM vs ZBH
+3.8%
+100.4%
-28.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZBH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | +0.1% | -1.3% | -1.2% |
| 7D | -2.0% | -2.4% | +0.5% | -1.8% |
| 30D | -4.4% | +16.6% | -21.0% | -5.1% |
| 3M | -8.8% | +10.8% | -19.7% | -9.3% |
| 6M | -15.9% | +35.8% | -51.6% | -16.9% |
| YTD | -7.7% | +20.5% | -28.2% | -8.2% |
| 1Y | -3.6% | +22.7% | -26.3% | -4.1% |
| All | +104.1% | +3.8% | +100.4% | +98.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZBH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZBH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZBH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZBH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling