+219.4%
GLDM vs XPO
+393.1%
-173.7%
-28.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | XPO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | +0.3% | -1.1% | -0.8% |
| 7D | +4.7% | -6.7% | +11.3% | +4.7% |
| 30D | -0.9% | -1.9% | +1.0% | -0.9% |
| 3M | -4.3% | -9.9% | +5.6% | -4.2% |
| 6M | -13.4% | -16.4% | +3.0% | -13.3% |
| YTD | -5.8% | +30.2% | -36.0% | -5.8% |
| 1Y | +2.1% | +29.9% | -27.8% | +2.1% |
| 3Y | +105.0% | +122.6% | -17.6% | +104.7% |
| 5Y | +122.5% | +278.9% | -156.4% | +121.1% |
| All | +219.4% | +393.1% | -173.7% | +216.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside XPO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus XPO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × XPO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded XPO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling