+105.0%
GLDM vs TXT
+7.8%
+97.2%
-28.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TXT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | -2.0% | +1.2% | -0.7% |
| 7D | +4.7% | -2.5% | +7.2% | +4.8% |
| 30D | -0.9% | +14.4% | -15.3% | -1.9% |
| 3M | -4.3% | -4.9% | +0.6% | -4.0% |
| 6M | -13.4% | -10.2% | -3.2% | -12.7% |
| YTD | -5.8% | -4.1% | -1.7% | -5.5% |
| 1Y | +2.1% | +4.0% | -1.9% | +2.3% |
| 3Y | +105.0% | +8.0% | +97.1% | +103.6% |
| All | +105.0% | +7.8% | +97.2% | +103.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TXT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TXT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TXT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TXT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling