-13.7%
GLDM vs TW
-15.0%
+1.3%
-23.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | TW | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | +0.8% | -1.7% | -0.8% |
| 7D | -0.5% | -2.3% | +1.8% | -0.9% |
| 30D | +4.4% | +3.9% | +0.5% | +5.0% |
| 3M | -1.1% | +5.7% | -6.8% | -0.6% |
| 6M | -13.7% | -14.5% | +0.9% | -16.9% |
| All | -13.7% | -15.0% | +1.3% | -16.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TW.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TW return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TW return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TW wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling