-13.7%
GLDM vs TRGP
+21.5%
-35.2%
-23.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | TRGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -1.2% | +0.3% | -1.2% |
| 7D | -0.5% | +0.8% | -1.3% | -0.4% |
| 30D | +4.4% | +11.5% | -7.1% | +6.9% |
| 3M | -1.1% | +9.0% | -10.1% | +0.9% |
| 6M | -13.7% | +20.5% | -34.2% | -10.3% |
| All | -13.7% | +21.5% | -35.2% | -10.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TRGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TRGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TRGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TRGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling