+129.7%
GLDM vs SEDG
-78.8%
+208.5%
-26.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | SEDG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | +1.2% | -2.1% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -0.5% | +8.9% | -9.4% | -0.8% |
| 30D | +4.4% | +0.9% | +3.5% | +4.3% |
| 3M | -1.1% | -53.2% | +52.2% | +0.7% |
| 6M | -13.7% | -9.9% | -3.8% | -14.1% |
| YTD | +2.8% | +18.5% | -15.8% | +1.4% |
| 1Y | +24.8% | +0.1% | +24.7% | +23.5% |
| All | +129.7% | -78.8% | +208.5% | +125.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SEDG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SEDG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SEDG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SEDG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling