+126.5%
GLDM vs SCHG
+88.4%
+38.1%
-26.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | SCHG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.7% | -0.8% | -0.9% | -1.6% |
| 7D | +0.7% | -0.1% | +0.8% | +0.8% |
| 30D | +0.3% | -1.5% | +1.8% | +0.6% |
| 3M | +0.7% | +4.4% | -3.7% | +0.1% |
| 6M | -15.4% | +15.7% | -31.2% | -16.8% |
| YTD | +1.0% | +8.3% | -7.3% | -0.3% |
| 1Y | +19.7% | +14.2% | +5.5% | +17.9% |
| 3Y | +126.5% | +88.3% | +38.2% | +120.7% |
| All | +126.5% | +88.4% | +38.1% | +120.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SCHG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SCHG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SCHG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SCHG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling