+129.7%
GLDM vs RPRX
+128.5%
+1.2%
-26.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | RPRX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | +0.1% | -1.0% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -0.5% | +5.1% | -5.6% | -0.9% |
| 30D | +4.4% | +11.2% | -6.8% | +3.7% |
| 3M | -1.1% | +16.7% | -17.8% | -2.1% |
| 6M | -13.7% | +36.0% | -49.7% | -15.4% |
| YTD | +2.8% | +67.8% | -65.0% | 0.0% |
| 1Y | +24.8% | +76.7% | -51.8% | +21.2% |
| All | +129.7% | +128.5% | +1.2% | +114.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RPRX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RPRX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RPRX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RPRX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling