+248.5%
GLDM vs RNG
+5.9%
+242.5%
-26.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | RNG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -3.9% | +3.0% | -0.8% |
| 7D | -0.5% | +5.8% | -6.3% | -0.6% |
| 30D | +4.4% | +19.6% | -15.2% | +4.1% |
| 3M | -1.1% | +67.0% | -68.1% | -2.0% |
| 6M | -13.7% | +88.4% | -102.0% | -14.8% |
| YTD | +2.8% | +155.5% | -152.7% | +0.6% |
| 1Y | +24.8% | +141.7% | -116.8% | +22.3% |
| 3Y | +127.8% | +131.1% | -3.3% | +122.3% |
| 5Y | +141.1% | -70.6% | +211.7% | +143.6% |
| All | +248.5% | +5.9% | +242.5% | +259.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RNG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RNG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RNG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RNG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling