+129.7%
GLDM vs REPL
-22.6%
+152.3%
-26.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | REPL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -1.6% | +0.7% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -0.5% | -3.0% | +2.4% | -0.5% |
| 30D | +4.4% | +27.1% | -22.7% | +4.1% |
| 3M | -1.1% | +52.4% | -53.4% | -1.7% |
| 6M | -13.7% | +107.4% | -121.1% | -15.6% |
| YTD | +2.8% | +54.7% | -52.0% | +0.7% |
| 1Y | +24.8% | +158.9% | -134.0% | +21.3% |
| All | +129.7% | -22.6% | +152.3% | +119.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside REPL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus REPL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × REPL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded REPL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling