+129.7%
GLDM vs PSKY
-16.0%
+145.7%
-26.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PSKY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -1.6% | +0.7% | -0.8% |
| 7D | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.3% | -0.5% |
| 30D | +4.4% | +24.0% | -19.6% | +3.6% |
| 3M | -1.1% | +2.2% | -3.2% | -1.2% |
| 6M | -13.7% | -9.0% | -4.7% | -13.6% |
| YTD | +2.8% | -18.1% | +20.9% | +3.1% |
| 1Y | +24.8% | -25.1% | +49.9% | +25.3% |
| All | +129.7% | -16.0% | +145.7% | +126.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PSKY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PSKY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PSKY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PSKY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling