+129.7%
GLDM vs PSA
+23.9%
+105.7%
-26.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PSA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -1.2% | +0.3% | -0.7% |
| 7D | -0.5% | -3.7% | +3.1% | 0.0% |
| 30D | +4.4% | -7.7% | +12.1% | +5.7% |
| 3M | -1.1% | -0.6% | -0.5% | -1.2% |
| 6M | -13.7% | -0.9% | -12.8% | -13.9% |
| YTD | +2.8% | +18.7% | -15.9% | 0.0% |
| 1Y | +24.8% | +7.6% | +17.2% | +22.9% |
| All | +129.7% | +23.9% | +105.7% | +117.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PSA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PSA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PSA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PSA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling