+50.5%
GLDM vs PLTU
+90.0%
-39.5%
-28.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTU | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | -19.6% | +20.5% | +1.3% |
| 7D | +1.9% | -39.1% | +41.0% | +3.0% |
| 30D | -1.7% | -37.6% | +35.9% | -0.7% |
| 3M | -3.5% | -12.7% | +9.2% | -3.4% |
| 6M | -10.1% | +1.7% | -11.8% | -10.8% |
| YTD | -5.0% | -48.8% | +43.7% | -5.5% |
| 1Y | +2.8% | -56.2% | +58.9% | +2.3% |
| All | +50.5% | +90.0% | -39.5% | +45.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTU.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTU return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTU return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTU wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling