+129.7%
GLDM vs PL
+454.1%
-324.5%
-26.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -1.3% | +0.4% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -0.5% | -9.3% | +8.8% | -0.2% |
| 30D | +4.4% | -18.9% | +23.3% | +5.1% |
| 3M | -1.1% | -58.4% | +57.3% | +1.3% |
| 6M | -13.7% | -30.3% | +16.6% | -13.0% |
| YTD | +2.8% | -8.1% | +10.9% | +2.9% |
| 1Y | +24.8% | +180.5% | -155.6% | +22.8% |
| All | +129.7% | +454.1% | -324.5% | +117.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling