-13.7%
GLDM vs PFGC
+6.6%
-20.3%
-23.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | PFGC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -0.5% | -0.4% | -0.8% |
| 7D | -0.5% | -2.2% | +1.7% | -0.2% |
| 30D | +4.4% | -11.9% | +16.3% | +6.0% |
| 3M | -1.1% | +5.0% | -6.1% | -3.8% |
| 6M | -13.7% | +8.6% | -22.3% | -17.3% |
| All | -13.7% | +6.6% | -20.3% | -17.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PFGC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PFGC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PFGC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PFGC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling