+129.7%
GLDM vs PBF
+65.3%
+64.3%
-26.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PBF | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -1.3% | +0.4% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -0.5% | +4.3% | -4.8% | -0.6% |
| 30D | +4.4% | +22.0% | -17.6% | +4.1% |
| 3M | -1.1% | +74.5% | -75.6% | -1.8% |
| 6M | -13.7% | +67.7% | -81.3% | -14.4% |
| YTD | +2.8% | +179.2% | -176.4% | -0.4% |
| 1Y | +24.8% | +170.0% | -145.2% | +20.9% |
| All | +129.7% | +65.3% | +64.3% | +124.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PBF.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PBF return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PBF return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PBF wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling