+137.6%
GLDM vs NXT
+178.8%
-41.2%
-26.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NXT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | +1.2% | -2.1% | -1.0% |
| 7D | -0.5% | -1.1% | +0.6% | -0.5% |
| 30D | +4.4% | -15.3% | +19.7% | +5.2% |
| 3M | -1.1% | -43.8% | +42.7% | +1.3% |
| 6M | -13.7% | -18.7% | +5.0% | -12.7% |
| YTD | +2.8% | -3.0% | +5.8% | +3.8% |
| 1Y | +24.8% | +22.7% | +2.1% | +25.7% |
| 3Y | +127.8% | +95.9% | +31.9% | +128.2% |
| All | +137.6% | +178.8% | -41.2% | +145.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NXT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NXT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NXT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NXT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling