+129.7%
GLDM vs NWSA
+47.8%
+81.8%
-26.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NWSA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -1.8% | +0.9% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -0.5% | -1.9% | +1.3% | -0.5% |
| 30D | +4.4% | +4.6% | -0.2% | +4.4% |
| 3M | -1.1% | +13.2% | -14.3% | -1.2% |
| 6M | -13.7% | +27.0% | -40.7% | -14.0% |
| YTD | +2.8% | +16.8% | -14.1% | +2.4% |
| 1Y | +24.8% | +4.5% | +20.3% | +25.0% |
| All | +129.7% | +47.8% | +81.8% | +121.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NWSA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NWSA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NWSA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NWSA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling