+263.8%
GLDM vs NIO
-36.7%
+300.5%
-26.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -1.6% | +0.7% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -0.5% | -13.0% | +12.5% | -0.4% |
| 30D | +4.4% | -18.3% | +22.7% | +4.6% |
| 3M | -1.1% | -33.2% | +32.2% | -0.6% |
| 6M | -13.7% | -21.5% | +7.8% | -13.5% |
| YTD | +2.8% | -25.5% | +28.3% | +3.0% |
| 1Y | +24.8% | -38.0% | +62.9% | +25.3% |
| 3Y | +127.8% | -65.5% | +193.3% | +128.5% |
| 5Y | +141.1% | -90.6% | +231.7% | +142.0% |
| All | +263.8% | -36.7% | +300.5% | +269.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling