+128.2%
GLDM vs NBIX
+42.9%
+85.3%
-26.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NBIX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | 0.0% | +0.9% | +0.9% |
| 7D | +0.2% | -1.7% | +1.8% | +0.3% |
| 30D | +0.3% | -5.9% | +6.2% | +0.6% |
| 3M | +3.3% | -6.1% | +9.4% | +3.6% |
| 6M | -14.5% | +19.4% | -33.9% | -15.4% |
| YTD | +1.9% | +9.4% | -7.4% | +1.2% |
| 1Y | +21.1% | +7.6% | +13.5% | +20.2% |
| All | +128.2% | +42.9% | +85.3% | +124.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NBIX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NBIX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NBIX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NBIX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling