+248.5%
GLDM vs M
-12.9%
+261.4%
-26.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | M | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | +2.6% | -3.5% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -0.5% | +4.7% | -5.3% | -0.5% |
| 30D | +4.4% | -9.6% | +14.0% | +4.3% |
| 3M | -1.1% | +0.9% | -1.9% | -1.0% |
| 6M | -13.7% | +22.3% | -35.9% | -13.5% |
| YTD | +2.8% | +6.5% | -3.8% | +2.9% |
| 1Y | +24.8% | +38.8% | -13.9% | +25.3% |
| 3Y | +127.8% | +115.9% | +11.9% | +130.8% |
| 5Y | +141.1% | +28.6% | +112.5% | +143.8% |
| All | +248.5% | -12.9% | +261.4% | +253.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside M.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus M return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × M return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded M wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling