-3.6%
GLDM vs LNT
+12.7%
-16.3%
-28.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | +0.5% | -1.7% | -1.2% |
| 7D | -2.0% | -0.2% | -1.7% | -2.0% |
| 30D | -4.4% | +11.6% | -16.1% | -4.7% |
| 3M | -8.8% | +8.2% | -17.0% | -9.2% |
| 6M | -15.9% | +3.1% | -19.0% | -16.3% |
| YTD | -7.7% | +16.8% | -24.5% | -10.7% |
| 1Y | -3.6% | +11.6% | -15.2% | -6.4% |
| All | -3.6% | +12.7% | -16.3% | -6.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling