+104.9%
GLDM vs LDOS
+35.2%
+69.7%
-28.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.7% | +0.7% | +3.0% | +3.7% |
| 7D | -0.3% | -2.8% | +2.5% | -0.2% |
| 30D | -1.9% | +13.6% | -15.4% | -2.2% |
| 3M | -0.4% | +4.2% | -4.6% | -0.6% |
| 6M | -10.1% | -8.2% | -1.9% | -9.9% |
| YTD | -5.8% | -24.1% | +18.2% | -5.1% |
| 1Y | +3.1% | -31.2% | +34.3% | +4.0% |
| All | +104.9% | +35.2% | +69.7% | +114.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling