+106.7%
GLDM vs LDOS
+35.4%
+71.3%
-28.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | +0.1% | +0.8% | +0.8% |
| 7D | +1.9% | -3.7% | +5.6% | +2.0% |
| 30D | -1.7% | +16.4% | -18.1% | -2.1% |
| 3M | -3.5% | +7.4% | -10.9% | -3.8% |
| 6M | -10.1% | -0.3% | -9.7% | -10.2% |
| YTD | -5.0% | -24.0% | +19.0% | -4.3% |
| 1Y | +2.8% | -29.6% | +32.3% | +3.7% |
| All | +106.7% | +35.4% | +71.3% | +116.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling