+107.7%
GLDM vs IWF
+66.6%
+41.1%
-28.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | IWF | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.6% | -0.9% | -1.8% | -2.5% |
| 7D | +2.9% | -2.9% | +5.8% | +3.4% |
| 30D | -3.9% | -10.9% | +7.0% | -1.8% |
| 3M | -8.1% | -8.1% | 0.0% | -6.7% |
| 6M | -14.7% | -7.5% | -7.2% | -13.4% |
| YTD | -6.6% | -3.4% | -3.2% | -6.0% |
| 1Y | -2.1% | -5.0% | +2.9% | -1.3% |
| 3Y | +107.7% | +64.0% | +43.7% | +91.2% |
| All | +107.7% | +66.6% | +41.1% | +91.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside IWF.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus IWF return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × IWF return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded IWF wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling