+107.0%
GLDM vs GFS
-25.2%
+132.2%
-28.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | GFS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -2.7% | +2.8% | +0.2% |
| 7D | -4.6% | +7.4% | -12.0% | -4.9% |
| 30D | -5.5% | -15.3% | +9.8% | -4.9% |
| 3M | -10.9% | -21.1% | +10.2% | -10.2% |
| 6M | -17.3% | -44.5% | +27.1% | -16.0% |
| YTD | -10.2% | +19.2% | -29.4% | -10.3% |
| 1Y | -6.9% | +27.2% | -34.2% | -7.1% |
| 3Y | +98.7% | -20.1% | +118.8% | +98.9% |
| All | +107.0% | -25.2% | +132.2% | +107.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GFS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GFS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GFS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GFS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling