+21.1%
GLDM vs FLNC
+40.4%
-19.3%
-26.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | -8.3% | +9.3% | +1.3% |
| 7D | +0.2% | -4.2% | +4.3% | +0.3% |
| 30D | +0.3% | -20.0% | +20.3% | +1.3% |
| 3M | +3.3% | -56.9% | +60.2% | +7.1% |
| 6M | -14.5% | -35.5% | +21.1% | -13.9% |
| YTD | +1.9% | -48.8% | +50.8% | +4.0% |
| 1Y | +21.1% | +49.3% | -28.2% | +20.0% |
| All | +21.1% | +40.4% | -19.3% | +20.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling