-13.4%
GLDM vs FCUV
-38.1%
+24.7%
-18.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | FCUV | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | -2.9% | +2.1% | -0.8% |
| 7D | +4.7% | -13.0% | +17.6% | +4.6% |
| 30D | -0.9% | -36.9% | +36.0% | -1.0% |
| 3M | -4.3% | -65.3% | +61.0% | -4.3% |
| 6M | -13.4% | -32.9% | +19.5% | -12.3% |
| All | -13.4% | -38.1% | +24.7% | -12.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FCUV.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FCUV return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FCUV return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FCUV wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling