+104.9%
GLDM vs EPAM
-42.9%
+147.8%
-28.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.7% | -0.6% | +4.3% | +3.7% |
| 7D | -0.3% | +0.8% | -1.1% | -0.3% |
| 30D | -1.9% | +24.9% | -26.8% | -1.7% |
| 3M | -0.4% | +22.6% | -23.0% | -0.3% |
| 6M | -10.1% | +24.2% | -34.3% | -10.0% |
| YTD | -5.8% | -33.0% | +27.1% | -6.9% |
| 1Y | +3.1% | -13.3% | +16.4% | +2.5% |
| All | +104.9% | -42.9% | +147.8% | +104.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling