+106.6%
GLDM vs DKS
+44.9%
+61.6%
-28.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DKS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.6% | +1.6% | -4.2% | -2.7% |
| 7D | +2.9% | +9.4% | -6.6% | +2.6% |
| 30D | -3.9% | +9.8% | -13.7% | -4.2% |
| 3M | -8.1% | -29.3% | +21.1% | -7.6% |
| 6M | -14.7% | -32.6% | +17.9% | -14.1% |
| YTD | -6.6% | -22.6% | +16.0% | -6.1% |
| 1Y | -2.1% | -29.8% | +27.8% | -1.5% |
| All | +106.6% | +44.9% | +61.6% | +94.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DKS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DKS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DKS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DKS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling