+107.7%
GLDM vs DINO
+110.3%
-2.6%
-28.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DINO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.6% | -1.0% | -1.6% | -2.6% |
| 7D | +2.9% | -12.9% | +15.7% | +2.7% |
| 30D | -3.9% | -18.6% | +14.7% | -4.1% |
| 3M | -8.1% | +16.6% | -24.7% | -8.3% |
| 6M | -14.7% | +38.2% | -52.8% | -14.9% |
| YTD | -6.6% | +119.3% | -125.9% | -8.4% |
| 1Y | -2.1% | +84.3% | -86.3% | -3.4% |
| 3Y | +107.7% | +107.1% | +0.6% | +103.5% |
| All | +107.7% | +110.3% | -2.6% | +103.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DINO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DINO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DINO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DINO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling