+129.7%
GLDM vs DINO
+107.5%
+22.1%
-26.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DINO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -0.7% | -0.2% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -0.5% | +5.7% | -6.2% | -0.5% |
| 30D | +4.4% | +27.8% | -23.4% | +4.4% |
| 3M | -1.1% | +45.6% | -46.7% | -1.2% |
| 6M | -13.7% | +88.5% | -102.1% | -14.4% |
| YTD | +2.8% | +134.1% | -131.3% | +0.8% |
| 1Y | +24.8% | +111.1% | -86.3% | +22.9% |
| All | +129.7% | +107.5% | +22.1% | +126.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DINO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DINO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DINO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DINO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling