+248.5%
GLDM vs CCEP
+230.1%
+18.4%
-26.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | CCEP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -3.1% | +2.2% | -0.8% |
| 7D | -0.5% | -3.1% | +2.5% | -0.4% |
| 30D | +4.4% | -2.6% | +7.0% | +4.5% |
| 3M | -1.1% | +14.9% | -16.0% | -1.5% |
| 6M | -13.7% | +2.3% | -15.9% | -13.8% |
| YTD | +2.8% | +17.8% | -15.1% | +2.3% |
| 1Y | +24.8% | +24.2% | +0.6% | +24.1% |
| 3Y | +127.8% | +84.7% | +43.1% | +125.3% |
| 5Y | +141.1% | +103.2% | +38.0% | +138.1% |
| All | +248.5% | +230.1% | +18.4% | +246.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CCEP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CCEP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CCEP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CCEP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling