+129.7%
GLDM vs CAG
-36.5%
+166.2%
-26.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CAG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -0.9% | 0.0% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -0.5% | -3.8% | +3.3% | -0.4% |
| 30D | +4.4% | +3.1% | +1.3% | +4.3% |
| 3M | -1.1% | +23.5% | -24.5% | -1.7% |
| 6M | -13.7% | -14.8% | +1.2% | -13.2% |
| YTD | +2.8% | -5.4% | +8.2% | +3.3% |
| 1Y | +24.8% | -11.8% | +36.6% | +25.6% |
| All | +129.7% | -36.5% | +166.2% | +128.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CAG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CAG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CAG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CAG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling