+46.6%
GLDM vs BIYA
-99.8%
+146.4%
-26.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | BIYA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -1.7% | +0.8% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -0.5% | +1.3% | -1.9% | -0.5% |
| 30D | +4.4% | -21.0% | +25.4% | +4.1% |
| 3M | -1.1% | -74.3% | +73.3% | -1.5% |
| 6M | -13.7% | -84.6% | +71.0% | -13.0% |
| YTD | +2.8% | -94.2% | +96.9% | +2.3% |
| 1Y | +24.8% | -98.2% | +123.1% | +23.4% |
| All | +46.6% | -99.8% | +146.4% | +43.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIYA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIYA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIYA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIYA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling