+140.0%
GLDM vs AUR
-36.6%
+176.6%
-26.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | AUR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | +0.3% | -1.2% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -0.5% | +8.7% | -9.3% | -0.8% |
| 30D | +4.4% | -5.2% | +9.6% | +4.5% |
| 3M | -1.1% | -7.3% | +6.2% | -1.0% |
| 6M | -13.7% | +41.2% | -54.9% | -14.5% |
| YTD | +2.8% | +65.1% | -62.3% | +1.5% |
| 1Y | +24.8% | +13.4% | +11.4% | +23.9% |
| 3Y | +127.8% | +98.1% | +29.7% | +121.6% |
| 5Y | +141.1% | -36.0% | +177.2% | +129.7% |
| All | +140.0% | -36.6% | +176.6% | +128.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AUR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AUR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AUR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AUR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling