-10.1%
GLDM vs ARMK
+12.8%
-22.9%
-18.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | -3.9% | +4.7% | +1.1% |
| 7D | +1.9% | -10.2% | +12.1% | +2.7% |
| 30D | -1.7% | -9.3% | +7.6% | -1.0% |
| 3M | -3.5% | -11.4% | +7.9% | -2.8% |
| 6M | -10.1% | +11.6% | -21.7% | -9.2% |
| All | -10.1% | +12.8% | -22.9% | -9.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling