+129.7%
GLDM vs AME
+50.7%
+78.9%
-26.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AME | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | +1.5% | -2.4% | -1.1% |
| 7D | -0.5% | +0.6% | -1.2% | -0.6% |
| 30D | +4.4% | -6.7% | +11.1% | +5.2% |
| 3M | -1.1% | +4.1% | -5.1% | -1.5% |
| 6M | -13.7% | +1.6% | -15.2% | -14.1% |
| YTD | +2.8% | +16.1% | -13.4% | +2.1% |
| 1Y | +24.8% | +27.3% | -2.5% | +24.0% |
| All | +129.7% | +50.7% | +78.9% | +132.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AME.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AME return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AME return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AME wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling