+104.8%
GLDM vs AMDL
+95.0%
+9.8%
-26.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | AMDL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | +9.2% | -10.1% | -1.2% |
| 7D | -0.5% | +4.5% | -5.1% | -0.7% |
| 30D | +4.4% | -4.4% | +8.8% | +4.5% |
| 3M | -1.1% | -30.5% | +29.4% | -0.8% |
| 6M | -13.7% | +300.9% | -314.6% | -18.6% |
| YTD | +2.8% | +219.9% | -217.2% | -2.8% |
| 1Y | +24.8% | +374.7% | -349.9% | +16.8% |
| All | +104.8% | +95.0% | +9.8% | +98.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMDL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMDL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMDL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMDL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling