+145.9%
GLDM vs ALHC
-33.5%
+179.4%
-26.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | 0.0% | -0.9% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -0.5% | -0.6% | +0.1% | -0.5% |
| 30D | +4.4% | -1.0% | +5.4% | +4.4% |
| 3M | -1.1% | -10.2% | +9.1% | -1.0% |
| 6M | -13.7% | -28.3% | +14.6% | -13.5% |
| YTD | +2.8% | -31.4% | +34.2% | +3.0% |
| 1Y | +24.8% | -16.9% | +41.8% | +25.0% |
| 3Y | +127.8% | +135.5% | -7.7% | +125.7% |
| All | +145.9% | -33.5% | +179.4% | +148.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling