+129.7%
GLDM vs AIG
+38.1%
+91.6%
-26.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AIG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -0.8% | 0.0% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -0.5% | -0.9% | +0.4% | -0.5% |
| 30D | +4.4% | -4.9% | +9.3% | +4.6% |
| 3M | -1.1% | +4.5% | -5.5% | -1.3% |
| 6M | -13.7% | -1.4% | -12.2% | -13.7% |
| YTD | +2.8% | -9.8% | +12.6% | +3.0% |
| 1Y | +24.8% | -4.5% | +29.4% | +24.9% |
| All | +129.7% | +38.1% | +91.6% | +126.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AIG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AIG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AIG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AIG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling