+104.1%
GLDM vs AEHR
+172.8%
-68.7%
-28.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AEHR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | +10.4% | -11.6% | -1.6% |
| 7D | -2.0% | +8.1% | -10.1% | -2.4% |
| 30D | -4.4% | -15.9% | +11.4% | -4.2% |
| 3M | -8.8% | -43.9% | +35.0% | -7.4% |
| 6M | -15.9% | -37.1% | +21.2% | -15.8% |
| YTD | -7.7% | +225.8% | -233.5% | -13.4% |
| 1Y | -3.6% | +184.0% | -187.6% | -9.4% |
| All | +104.1% | +172.8% | -68.7% | +94.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AEHR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AEHR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AEHR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AEHR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling