+145.9%
GLDM vs ACGL
+161.8%
-15.9%
-26.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -1.7% | +0.8% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -0.5% | -0.7% | +0.2% | -0.6% |
| 30D | +4.4% | -1.0% | +5.4% | +4.4% |
| 3M | -1.1% | +11.0% | -12.1% | -0.9% |
| 6M | -13.7% | -0.3% | -13.3% | -13.6% |
| YTD | +2.8% | +2.3% | +0.5% | +2.8% |
| 1Y | +24.8% | +6.4% | +18.5% | +24.9% |
| 3Y | +127.8% | +34.0% | +93.8% | +129.1% |
| All | +145.9% | +161.8% | -15.9% | +149.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling