+109.1%
GLD vs ZCMD
-100.0%
+209.1%
-28.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.9% | +2.6% | -0.7% | +1.9% |
| 7D | +4.9% | +9.1% | -4.1% | +4.9% |
| 30D | -1.3% | -37.1% | +35.8% | -0.9% |
| 3M | -4.8% | -53.7% | +49.0% | -4.2% |
| 6M | -12.5% | -99.7% | +87.2% | -11.5% |
| YTD | -4.2% | -99.9% | +95.6% | -2.9% |
| 1Y | +3.0% | -99.9% | +102.9% | +4.7% |
| 3Y | +109.1% | -100.0% | +209.1% | +107.0% |
| All | +109.1% | -100.0% | +209.1% | +107.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling