+96.6%
GLD vs WFC
+125.7%
-29.1%
-28.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | WFC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.8% | 0.0% | -2.8% | -2.8% |
| 7D | -5.5% | +1.7% | -7.2% | -5.5% |
| 30D | -7.0% | +6.8% | -13.9% | -7.2% |
| 3M | -12.4% | -3.0% | -9.4% | -12.4% |
| 6M | -18.0% | +15.4% | -33.4% | -18.2% |
| YTD | -10.5% | -5.9% | -4.5% | -10.6% |
| 1Y | -8.1% | +1.7% | -9.7% | -8.2% |
| All | +96.6% | +125.7% | -29.1% | +88.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside WFC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus WFC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × WFC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded WFC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling