+134.9%
GLD vs TPG
+85.9%
+49.0%
-26.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | TPG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.7% | -3.3% | +1.6% | -1.6% |
| 7D | +0.7% | -2.9% | +3.6% | +0.8% |
| 30D | +0.3% | +5.0% | -4.7% | +0.2% |
| 3M | +0.6% | +24.9% | -24.3% | 0.0% |
| 6M | -15.6% | +21.1% | -36.7% | -16.1% |
| YTD | +0.9% | -17.3% | +18.1% | +0.7% |
| 1Y | +19.4% | -9.8% | +29.2% | +19.0% |
| 3Y | +124.5% | +95.4% | +29.0% | +118.7% |
| All | +134.9% | +85.9% | +49.0% | +128.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TPG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TPG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TPG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TPG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling